Traverse City Record-Eagle

February 1, 2010

Experts: Preserve Great Lakes wetlands

Groups team up to combat wetlands disturbance

By CHENQI GUO

LANSING -- The Great Lakes face another serious environmental threat besides Asian carp, experts warn: coastal wetlands disturbance.

"The development of coastal wetlands is the biggest problem," said James Clift, policy director for the Michigan Environmental Council. "People are coming in and they need places for water fun development. As a result, we are losing wetlands."

Coastal wetlands provide habitat for rare species, wildlife and more than 90 percent of Great Lakes fish. Extensive wetlands once flourished along the shorelines, especially along Lake Erie, Lake St. Clair and the Saginaw Bay.

Prior to the mid-1970s, wetlands destruction through dredging, draining and filling were permitted practices.

As a result, according to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Michigan has lost approximately half of its wetland resources since European settlement.

That means wildlife is losing its place to live.

"Human activity is the most direct cause. People fill in wetlands which changes the water level of them," said Alan Steinman, director of the Annis Water Resources Institute in Muskegon.

Steinman's group is working on Great Lakes water levels around the Upper Peninsula with the International Joint Commission in Traverse City, and on regulations for Lake Superior.

Environmental organizations, including the council, are making efforts to protect wetlands.

Erin McDonough, executive director of Michigan United Conservation Clubs, pointed to a $475 million Obama administration proposal to preserve and improve the ecosystem of Great Lakes communities.

Also, the council is cooperating with Tip of the Mitt Watershed Council in Petoskey to purify water, control flooding and protect wildlife.

"We made a great effort last year to keep Michigan's landmark wetland protection law run by the state instead of the federal government. We are really happy to see that program remains this year," Clift said.

"The environmental community believes having the state continue administration of the program is the best way to protect the Great Lakes and eliminates barriers to the recovery of Michigan's economy," he said.

Chenqi Guo writes for Michigan State University's Capital News Service.