Traverse City Record-Eagle

Opinion

February 12, 2008

Editorial: Restaurant smoking ban a matter of public health

If you want to know why Michigan bans smoking (via local ordinances) in virtually every workplace except bars and restaurants, there is a short answer: Cash. The longer answer: Campaign contributions.

While Michigan's bar and restaurant owners and beer and wine distributors are hardly considered opinion leaders on most issues, they -- with help from Big Tobacco -- have this one hog-tied.

Employees in virtually every line of work other than bartender, waitress or waiter in Michigan can't smoke on the job and are protected from having to put up with second-hand smoke from co-workers. Lawmakers realized it was a health issue and acted.

But because the liquor and tobacco lobbies have money to spend -- and know just which lawmakers to give it to -- a non-smoker working his or her way through college or supporting a family as a server or bartender can go home every night stinking of smoke after inhaling the equivalent of a pack of cigarettes.

It's a classic case of cash over conscience. Our most notable local practitioner is state Sen. Jason Allen, R-Traverse City, who in 2004 refused to allow a senate committee vote on a proposal to ban smoking in Michigan restaurants; he has received at least $5,000 in political contributions from tobacco companies and related interests and $8,900 from restaurant and bar associations in recent years.

When asked by Traverse City Mayor Michael Estes to sponsor legislation allowing local communities to ban smoking in bars and restaurants, Allen gave a familiar answer: Leave that decision to business owners and consumers. Employees? Not at all.

It's an argument straight out of the smoking lobby playbook that, while harkening back to basics, ignores a more basic right -- to breathe. This is a health issue. It's not a debate over competition or choice; it's about being able to work without risking one's life.

Until just a couple decades ago, workers in certain fields were routinely exposed to asbestos, lead or noxious substances of all kinds because that was part of the job. Once medical evidence mounted to the point where the threat to society and individual health was perceived to be greater than the needs of industry, it stopped.

For tobacco, that time has come; except in the case of bars and restaurants, Michigan employees are no longer required to risk their health through exposure to second-hand smoke for a paycheck.

Today, we look back at the people who fought the rear-guard actions to protect industries that relied on asbestos and lead and shake our heads. What were they thinking?

We can't let that happen again. Bar and restaurant smoking is a health issue, period. Exposure to a known carcinogen cannot be the price of earning a living.

Text Only

AP Video
Raw Video: Greek Rioting Ahead of Austerity Vote Raw Video: Child Rescued After Kosovo Avalanche Pop Music Superstar Whitney Houston Dies at 48 Whitney Houston's Church Mourns Her Passing Reaction to Houston's Death at Clive Davis Party 79 Turtles Seized at Shanghai Airport Severe Cold Wreaks Havoc in China Fuel Removal Under Way on Capsized Italian Ship Police: Houston Found Dead in Her Hotel Room Paul Suffers Narrow Loss to Romney in Maine Palin Brings Anti-Washington Message to CPAC Obama Scraps Birth Control Mandate Navy Names Ship for Gabrielle Giffords Uzbek Man Pleads Guilty in Plot to Kill Obama Marines: No Punishment for Nazi-like Flag Vets Look to Translate Military Skills Into Jobs Raw Video: School Bus Burst Into Flames Pentagon: Allow Women Closer to Front Lines Raw Video: Italy's Mount Etna Bursts Into Life Air Force Airlines: Leaders Get Polished Service
Hyperlocal Search
Premier Guide
Find a business

Walking Fingers
Maps, Menus, Store hours, Coupons, and more...
Premier Guide
Popular Searches
Powered by Local.com
Helium debate
Helium
Opinion Poll